The Great Gold Realignment

How China's Clampdown Exposes the Paper Market and Threatens Dollar Hegemony

Jul 10, 2026

There’s a lot of loose talk these days about global resets when it comes to gold. And while some of it may be speculative, there’s also considerable empirical evidence pointing to an undeniable structural shift in which gold is rapidly becoming an increasingly formidable competitor to the U.S. dollar.

For roughly three decades, U.S. Treasury bonds have served as the undisputed primary asset held by central banks around the world to back their national currencies. But that era appears over. Today, data confirmed by central banks shows that the total amount of gold held by central banks worldwide now exceeds the volume of U.S. Treasury bonds sitting in banking reserves.

This shift is not some temporary anomaly. Rather, it’s a response to the coordinated—and accelerating—efforts by major BRICS economies to de-dollarize. While the original moniker stood for Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, the BRICS bloc now includes other countries such as Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, and Indonesia. A major goal of the intergovernmental organization has always been to increase representation and sovereignty for developing nations while decreasing U.S. dominance.

It would be easy to point to the ever-growing U.S. national debt or the threat of weaponization of the dollar via geopolitical sanctions as the motivation for the shift in banking reserves, but the broader driver is this historic realignment of global power now underway. Gold has long been the asset that governments turn to in times of uncertainty, and the tectonic shift in global power makes it more than prudent for banks to rethink their assets.

Moreover, not only has gold surpassed U.S. Treasury bonds as the primary reserve asset, it has done so by margins that likely far exceed currently reported figures. That’s because as the U.S. struggles to defend the dollar hegemony that underlies and funds its global power, the physical gold market is undergoing a historic structural decoupling from the traditional, Western-dominated paper system that has controlled gold’s price for decades.

The clear epicenter of the shift is China, which has seen the volume of gold flowing into the country skyrocket compared to last year. Gold plays an integral role in the “Chinese dream” and the everyday life of China’s citizens. It is deeply embedded in Chinese traditions, symbolizing prosperity and luck and offered as gifts to celebrate the most significant times in one’s life, such as birth, marriage, and other major life events. In 2014, Song Xin, president of the China Gold Association, said, “For China, gold’s strategic mission is to…be a strong support for China’s goals of becoming an economic power and realizing the ‘Chinese dream’.”

And it seems China is well on its way to utilizing gold to help achieve that dream. In the first five months of 2026, China imported 692 tons of gold—a massive 76% increase over the exact same period last year. Last month, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) made its largest single-month gold purchase since October 2023, marking “a record 20th consecutive month of continuous gold accumulation,” according to Bloomberg. But realize that even with all of this reporting, it is an open secret that the figures China reports on imports and on gold bought by the PBOC—whose gold purchases are reported separately from the import data—are understated and perhaps vastly so.

Guesstimates of the degree of underreporting range widely. Most focus on China’s reported holding of about 2,300 tonnes (metric tons) of monetary gold, a figure that seems ludicrously low. But it is important to note that monetary gold is reported as financial assets. This leads us to the balance sheet of the PBOC, which shows financial assets of about $6 trillion. China has been a persistent seller of U.S. Treasuries, leaving its current holdings at about $600 billion. It is a pretty good bet that much of the remaining $5.4 trillion are not actual dollars. Roughly estimating that $3 trillion of it could be gold is hardly a heroic assumption and could point to PBOC holdings of more than 24,000 tonnes. In addition, Chinese households are estimated to own more than 30,000 tonnes of gold. Factoring in all these numbers, total Chinese gold holdings could easily amount to well over 50,000 tonnes, and possibly more than 60,000.

China treats gold as a matter of national security and strictly bans its export. It also has been the world’s top gold-mining nation since 2007, with nearly all of its mined gold staying within China’s borders. Despite all of this home-grown gold, are there reasons to suspect that China could be getting gold sub rosa from outside of its borders as well? There is. Wide-eyed speculation could cast a suspicious eye toward Switzerland, where the largest gold refineries in the world have taken root. Now, most of these refineries are private, which means that their financial activity is not made public. However, in 2015, Indian company Rajesh Exports Limited purchased Valcambi—the largest of all the refineries and by far the most important precious metals refiner. And because Rajesh is publicly traded, it has to report. After its purchase of Valcambi, the revenues of Rajesh tripled, and they have remained at that elevated level and seem to be consistent with the price of gold. India has long been running massive and rapidly growing trade deficits with China. Large deficits happen, to be sure, but it would certainly reduce India’s financial tensions with a very important political partner in China if the reported financial deficits were offset.

China is getting extra gold from someplace. And remember, monetary gold is explicitly reported as a financial asset, making it a unique exception in global accounting standards. It certainly is merely a guess, but it’s interesting, nonetheless.

What is crystal clear is that China has far more gold than any other country. But what China does not have is a mechanism for realizing the true value of its gold. That’s because gold’s price is set on futures exchanges in the U.S. and England. On those exchanges, gold can be bought on margin of just 5%—i.e., one dollar can control $20 worth of gold. In other words, the value of gold on the U.S. COMEX is almost completely divorced from an actual physical value.

Is it any surprise, then, that a major Chinese goal is to create a market that represents a true physical price for gold? This would mean a market in which all transactions would represent a one-to-one exchange between gold and a currency whose value is exactly equal to the value of the gold it buys—no margin, no speculation.

The first step has been to get China’s own house in order. According to reporting from the South China Morning Post, the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC)—the world’s largest bank by total assets—officially announced that it will permanently halt all retail precious metals trading services linked to the Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE) following market settlement on July 24, 2026.

And it isn’t just the ICBC. A sweeping banking coalition, including the Postal Savings Bank of China, Ping An Bank, and China Guangfa Bank, is actively winding down similar retail trading operations. Existing retail clients have been handed a strict ultimatum with only three choices before the fast-approaching deadline: close their position entirely, liquidate their current holdings into cash, or take physical delivery of their gold.

This move will deliberately dismantle the infrastructure that has allowed millions of retail customers to speculate on paper contracts that have prevented anyone from knowing the “true price” of gold. Beijing is forcing a grand migration into physical assets, which means it is cutting ties with Western-style leveraged speculation.

The second step is to set up Hong Kong as a premier, government-backed commodity and financial trading hub. On July 7, Hong Kong launched the trial operation of a new Gold Central Clearing and Settlement System: Hong Kong Precious Metals Central Clearing Company Limited (HKPMCC). Hong Kong is an international city with access to mainland China, so gold can flow freely. Investors are often hesitant to trade directly inside mainland China because of strict capital controls and tight regulations, but Hong Kong’s status as a separate customs and financial territory operating under a free-market system with no capital controls solves this problem.

And Hong Kong will always have access to China’s gold. The city will function as a physical and electronic gateway. Think of Shanghai as the wholesaler with immense bulk supply, and Hong Kong as the international retail floor. If someone wants to buy massive amounts of gold, they execute the trade through Hong Kong, and the physical pipeline automatically balances out in Shanghai. China is creating an entire ecosystem, with 11 major banks that possess the necessary capitalization and liquidity to settle large physical gold contracts, and institutions—specifically Bank of China—that operate the actual designated physical vaults and oversee the physical transfer of bullion under HKPMCC oversight. It’s a trading hub backed by real physical gold.

So how will Washington respond?

There is an acute, escalating concern that Western paper exchanges like the COMEX simply will not possess enough physical gold to fulfill people’s certificate calls when a mass-delivery event occurs. When a delivery crunch hits, the COMEX is forced to enter into desperate leasing arrangements—effectively borrowing gold from central banks or private institutions just to meet immediate physical redemptions.

This process triggers an insane cycle of leverage: Gold is leased, sold, claimed via paper certificates, and leased again. This fractionally reserved structure collapses entirely the second its participants demand the physical delivery of their assets.

As the U.S. dollar’s primary competitor moves from the shadows of the financial system directly into central bank vaults, Washington will inevitably be backed into a corner. How will the U.S. government react when the paper gold market breaks and physical prices soar? A cornered hegemonic power has two primary paths of retaliation: revaluing reserves or gathering up gold.

The U.S. officially claims to hold 8,133 metric tons of gold, book-valued at an archaic, static price of $42.22 per ounce—a statutory value established by Congress in 1973. The U.S. Treasury could choose to overnight revalue its official gold holdings to true market prices, instantly adding hundreds of billions of dollars to the asset side of its battered balance sheet to print liquidity against it. Or it could enter the open market to aggressively compete for remaining physical supplies. However, given the nation’s massive deficit and deteriorating fiscal position, trying to outbid Eastern central banks that have been quietly accumulating for decades, in addition to the banks around the world that are rapidly gathering gold, could trigger an uncontrollable spiral in the gold-to-dollar exchange rate.

But the scarier notion is that the U.S. could resort to seizing personal gold. One needs only to look back to April 1933, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed a law making it illegal for any U.S. citizen to hold personal gold, other than basic jewelry and collectible coins. So it is not outside of the bounds of history. For investors, the safest course of action would be to secure allocation over physical gold and store it securely either in a personal safe or a vault located completely outside of U.S. jurisdiction. That is, of course, unless the U.S. decides to join together with the non-Western world and cooperate in ways we’ve discussed in previous articles.

Stephen Leeb, PhD > Turbulent Times Investor News

Discussion about this post

Ready for more?